2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00607-006-0182-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Boundary Point Method to Solve Semidefinite Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of Sections 3 and 4 holds for any L satisfying (18), and hence for the Lipschitz constant L F ′ of F ′ , which by the definition is the smallest L satisfying (18). Clearly, the best iterationcomplexity bound, and most likely computational performance of the NPE, is obtained with L = L F ′ .…”
Section: Final Remarkmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of Sections 3 and 4 holds for any L satisfying (18), and hence for the Lipschitz constant L F ′ of F ′ , which by the definition is the smallest L satisfying (18). Clearly, the best iterationcomplexity bound, and most likely computational performance of the NPE, is obtained with L = L F ′ .…”
Section: Final Remarkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, the use of the notion of approximate solution as in Definition 2.3 have allowed us to obtain new block-decomposition methods (see [13]). In particular, one such block-decomposition method for solving conic semidefinite programming has been shown in [10] to outperform the two most competitive codes for large-scale conic semidefinite programs, namely: the boundary point method introduced by Povh et al [18] and the Newton-CG augmented Lagrangian method by Zhao et al [27]. Moreover, the use of the tolerances ε k in the definition of approximate solutions of (6) has played an important role in the analysis of Korpelevich's method given in [11,14] as well as the forward-backward method for convex optimization presented in [12].…”
Section: Endmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a long list of quite different algorithmic approaches for solving the SDP problem, see for instance [6,18,101,103,66,72,99,59,75,95,96,31,30,81,55,117,147,116], among many others. The previous list is by far incomplete and we do not intend to describe here all the diverse ideas to deal with the efficient solution of semidefinite programming.…”
Section: Theorem 23 If the Original Problem Optimal Value Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of Algorithm 2 is in some sense 'complementary' to the boundary point method of [8]. The latter algorithm generates iterates within the primal-dual cone approaching the set of linear constraints, while the iterates in Algorithm 2 always satisfy the linear constraints and approach the primal-dual cone.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toh uses an iterative solver for the augmented KKT system, and Kocvara and Stingl apply an iterative solver to a modified barrier problem. The approach presented in the current paper is closely related to the 'boundary point method' from [8] and the regularization approaches in [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%