2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2010.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A boundedness-preserving finite-difference scheme for a damped nonlinear wave equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple consistency analysis establishes in this case that finitedifference schemes (16), (17), (18) and (19) are, in general, consistent approximations to the solutions of (2) of order O( t + ( x) 2 ). Indeed, it is readily observed that the standard differences satisfy the properties…”
Section: Consistencymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A simple consistency analysis establishes in this case that finitedifference schemes (16), (17), (18) and (19) are, in general, consistent approximations to the solutions of (2) of order O( t + ( x) 2 ). Indeed, it is readily observed that the standard differences satisfy the properties…”
Section: Consistencymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In order to find conditions under which the finite-difference schemes presented in the previous subsection be nonnegative, it must be noticed beforehand that the coefficients of the term u k n+1 + u k n−1 in all four schemes are Table 1. Expressions of the four parametric functions k 1 , k 2 , k 3 and k 4 of u k n , for each of the Schemes (16), (17), (18) and (19) when presented in the explicit form (20).…”
Section: Positivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Chapter 6, the perturbation method is compared with a positivity and boundedness preserving non-standard finite-difference scheme [18,22]. First, convergence of the finite-difference solution ρ is established for one quarter wavelength by computing ρ at one spatial-step to the left of the right boundary for several decreasing mesh sizes, ( ) , t x ∆ ∆ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%