2009
DOI: 10.1080/01596300802643124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A boy who would rather write poetry than throw rocks at cats is also considered to be wanting in masculinity: poetry, masculinity, and baiting boys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their accounts also call into question some of the pedagogical approaches adopted around boys' reading (e.g. presumed non-fiction interests related to sports, war and world records) (Greig & Hughes, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Their accounts also call into question some of the pedagogical approaches adopted around boys' reading (e.g. presumed non-fiction interests related to sports, war and world records) (Greig & Hughes, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article challenges the deficit discourse around boys and reading (e.g. Whitmire, 2010) and builds on past studies illustrating the need to move beyond narrow boundaries around sanctioned 'boys' stuff' and using hyper-masculine non-fiction 'boy baits' in schools (Connell, 1989;Alloway et al, 2002;Dutro, 2003;Martino & Kehler, 2007;Greig & Hughes, 2009). Given recent findings related to the 'fiction effect' (Jerrim & Moss, 2019;Jerrim et al, 2020) and young people's academic achievement, we explore a group of primary school boys' reading interests and the diverse experiences of these boys as readers in contemporary society.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such “boy‐friendly” (Martino, 2008b) interventions based on this essentialist construction of masculinity have been deployed in Australian and UK schools for at least the last 15 years but these have failed to make any impact on the gender gap (DEEWR, 2010; Gorard & Smith, 2004; Martino & Kehler, 2007). Furthermore, not only have these “boy‐bait” (Greig & Hughes, 2009) strategies failed to eliminate the gender gap in literacy achievement but, as Lingard et al. (2009) have argued, “boy‐friendly” approaches let boys down by failing to stretch and challenge them intellectually whilst simultaneously exacerbating existing gender stereotypes.…”
Section: Key Factors In the Literature On Boys Literacy And Masculinmentioning
confidence: 99%