2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A brain–computer interface tool to assess cognitive functions in completely paralyzed patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-invasive BCI methods have been utilized more extensively than invasive methods for people with disabilities (Birbaumer & Cohen, 2007;Birbaumer et al, 2008;Gerven et al, 2009): unfortunately, whereas PALS and other patients in "locked-in" conditions have motivated research in this area, very few systems have been successfully used -such as that reported by Townsend and co-workers (2010). It has been postulated that some forms of cognitive impairment and changes in EEG signatures in late ALS stages may contribute to the lack of success using BCI technology (Iversen et al, 2008), as the technology was introduced after the participants had become "locked-in" (Gerven et al, 2009;Münte et al, 1998): really, the most successful application for communication has occurred in people at the beginning stages of ALS (Birbaumer et al, 1999;Birbaumer, 2006;Kubler et al, 2001). Nowadays, AAC acceptance and use represent two areas of interest for physicians and scientists.…”
Section: Treatment Of Impaired Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-invasive BCI methods have been utilized more extensively than invasive methods for people with disabilities (Birbaumer & Cohen, 2007;Birbaumer et al, 2008;Gerven et al, 2009): unfortunately, whereas PALS and other patients in "locked-in" conditions have motivated research in this area, very few systems have been successfully used -such as that reported by Townsend and co-workers (2010). It has been postulated that some forms of cognitive impairment and changes in EEG signatures in late ALS stages may contribute to the lack of success using BCI technology (Iversen et al, 2008), as the technology was introduced after the participants had become "locked-in" (Gerven et al, 2009;Münte et al, 1998): really, the most successful application for communication has occurred in people at the beginning stages of ALS (Birbaumer et al, 1999;Birbaumer, 2006;Kubler et al, 2001). Nowadays, AAC acceptance and use represent two areas of interest for physicians and scientists.…”
Section: Treatment Of Impaired Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding distinguishable features in the EEG signals can be used to design MI-based BCI systems [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Many BCI studies have reported good offline results with high accuracies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used EEG signals include the event-related P300 potentials [14][15][16][17][18], steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) [19][20][21][22][23], and the motor imagery (MI)-related rhythms [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. In these, the P300 potentials and SSVEPs are evoked by external stimuli and the MI rhythms are voluntarily modulated by the subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, other wireless EEG designs combine both stimulus player and EEG headset with synchronization [25,26]. In [22], the latter attempt, specific clinical hardware for stimulation with a specific SYN port was used (PS33-PLUS, by Grass Technologies); although in terms of usability, we would expect wireless EEG headsets to permit users to use their own stimulus players without addition of extra synchronization hardware.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are standalone solutions that do not integrate a stimulus player. Then, they are not meant to execute ERP paradigms but are suitable for others in which stimulation is not needed (e.g., self-regulation of low frequency cerebral rhythms [22], alpha band modulation [23] or steady-state EEG responses [24]). Conversely, other wireless EEG designs combine both stimulus player and EEG headset with synchronization [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%