IJCNN'99. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36339)
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.1999.833453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bridge between two paradigms for parallelism: neural networks and general purpose MIMD computers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are currently working on a MPI-based implementation to create an optimal version for this architecture. Overall, our results compare favourably with the performance reported in [2], both in terms of spead-up and execution time. …”
Section: Som Clustering Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…We are currently working on a MPI-based implementation to create an optimal version for this architecture. Overall, our results compare favourably with the performance reported in [2], both in terms of spead-up and execution time. …”
Section: Som Clustering Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…These wide varieties of examples demonstrate that considerable effort has been placed on applying these multivariate tools. Optimizations to par SOM, a software-based parallel implementation of the SOM was first introduced by Tomsich et al (2000) which provides a better performance compared to other implementation attempts such as the one reported in Boniface et al (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful applications have been reported in different industrial processes such as:start‐up operation in a steel casting process in Zhang and Dudzic (2006);operation of a copper smelter in Ross (1988);monitoring product quality in the food processing industry both in Sheridan et al (2006) and Yu et al (2003);monitoring of combustion processes in Yu and MacGregor (2004);remote sensing image analysis in Villmann et al (2003);discovering operational strategies in the refinery fluid catalytic cracking process in Sebzalli and Wang (2001);medical image analysis in Li et al (2006);genomics data modelling in Eriksson et al (2004);increase pharmaceutical data process understanding in Jorgensen et al (2004);adaptive modelling of an offset lithographic printing process in Englund and Verikas (2007); anddynamic modelling of the maize drying process in Liu et al (2006).These wide varieties of examples demonstrate that considerable effort has been placed on applying these multivariate tools. Optimizations to par SOM, a software‐based parallel implementation of the SOM was first introduced by Tomsich et al (2000) which provides a better performance compared to other implementation attempts such as the one reported in Boniface et al (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%