2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bridge too far? How boundary spanning networks drive organizational change and effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such studies include Burke and Litwin's (1992) A second group of studies concentrates on the "contexts" (i.e., circumstances or situations of change), taking both internal and external perspectives (Armenakis and Bedeian, 1999). For instance, Haveman (1992) analyses legislative and technological factors and their effects on organisational change; and Cross et al (2013) explain how variables in a business ecosystem influence organisational change.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of Organisational Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies include Burke and Litwin's (1992) A second group of studies concentrates on the "contexts" (i.e., circumstances or situations of change), taking both internal and external perspectives (Armenakis and Bedeian, 1999). For instance, Haveman (1992) analyses legislative and technological factors and their effects on organisational change; and Cross et al (2013) explain how variables in a business ecosystem influence organisational change.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of Organisational Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy policy issues have a fundamental characteristic which refers to its boundary spanning nature [125]. Energy policy is not just about energy issues.…”
Section: Institutions Policy Decision-making and Energy Infrastructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resister-Practically the opposite of energizers and tend to block a change effort; as Cross et al (2013) put it, these can be only a few people but "5% of employees cause 95% of the misery" (p. 83). Cross et al (2013) go on to argue persuasively that many organization change failures are due to an inability and/or perhaps an unwillingness to work across boundaries such as vertical (hierarchy and status), horizontal (peers, competitors, and experts), stakeholder (partners and constituencies), demographic (gender, age, and culture), and geographic (location and markets). Their organization change model is therefore an integration of network analysis and boundary spanning, that is, the network analysis helps to identify the key roles for effective boundary spanning.…”
Section: Loosely Coupled Systems and The Change Process: Social Netwomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an LCS social power is the key identifier. People who have this form of power are those recognized by Gladwell (2000) as connectors, mavens, and salesman and by Cross et al (2013) as connectors, brokers, energizers, and resisters, and those recognized by Battilana and Casciaro (2012) as network members who provide novel ideas that challenge the status quo and those who are talented at getting ideas implemented. Enhancing leadership in an LCS is a matter of identifying and coaching those who have social power.…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%