Executive functioning, language, and attention processes are commonly affected in acute stroke patients and predict long-term cognitive, emotional and functional impairment. Comprehensive assessment of these predictors is therefore vital for management, interventions and recovery. Brief cognitive screens are more appropriate than large batteries for acute stroke patients; however, they currently lack adequate measurement of language and executive functioning. In this study we investigated the validity, sensitivity, and specificity of the novel Brief Executive Language Screening Test (BELS); a ~20-minute test developed to assess core language, propositional language, and implicated executive functions (initiation, inhibition, selection, and strategy use). Method. The final sample included 78 acute stroke patients and 71 healthy controls. Convergent and divergent validity of BELS subtests was investigated via correlations with established neuropsychology tests. Predictive validity was investigated using logistic regression, and a ROC curve was employed to determine sensitivity and specificity. Results. Convergent validity was established for all but two BELS subtests via moderate-to-strong correlations with comparative neuropsychology tests. Divergent validity was established for all subtests via non-significant correlations with a dissimilar neuropsychology test. Low BELS scores significantly predicted stroke status after controlling for age, education, premorbid and fluid intelligence. The ROC Curve analysis indicated excellent discrimination (AUC = .94, p <.001, 95%CI [.91 - .98]). A cut-off of 84.25/100 was highly sensitive (.91) and specific (.80) when distinguishing acute stroke patients from healthy controls. Conclusion. The BELS is a valid bedside screening tool, sensitive to language and executive impairments experienced by acute stroke patients.