2011
DOI: 10.4103/0019-509x.75841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A brief review of voice restoration following total laryngectomy

Abstract: Despite advances in conservative laryngeal surgery and radiotherapy, total laryngectomy still remains the procedure of choice for advanced-stage (UICC T3 and T4) laryngeal carcinoma, around the world. The functional rehabilitation of the laryngectomized patients has been a concern of head and neck surgeons and speech therapists. Significant developments in speech rehabilitation over the past three decades have led to substantial improvements in the quality of life of these patients. The tracheoesophageal (TE) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3] Quality of life (QOL) is strongly impaired in patients suffering from voice loss, smell loss, respiratory tract changes, changes in lung function, weak cough reflexes, and complications associated with permanent tracheostomy. [4] Voice disorders and subsequent communication problems are perhaps the most obvious problems, and the rehabilitation process focuses on reestablishing functional communication. [3] There are several voice rehabilitation options available following total laryngectomy, including esophageal speech (ES) with air injected into and then expelled from the esophagus in a controlled way, tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis (TEP) using air inhaled during breathing or using the reconstructed pharynx as the new sound source (pharyngoesophageal [PE] segment), and electrolaryngeal speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Quality of life (QOL) is strongly impaired in patients suffering from voice loss, smell loss, respiratory tract changes, changes in lung function, weak cough reflexes, and complications associated with permanent tracheostomy. [4] Voice disorders and subsequent communication problems are perhaps the most obvious problems, and the rehabilitation process focuses on reestablishing functional communication. [3] There are several voice rehabilitation options available following total laryngectomy, including esophageal speech (ES) with air injected into and then expelled from the esophagus in a controlled way, tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis (TEP) using air inhaled during breathing or using the reconstructed pharynx as the new sound source (pharyngoesophageal [PE] segment), and electrolaryngeal speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients deemed to be suboptimal candidates for organ preservation strategies due to tumor- or comorbidity-related considerations, upfront TL should still be considered as an affordable and extremely reproducible procedure. While definitely unsurpassed in terms of oncological radicality, TL may also be compatible with a reasonable quality of life that, even though inherently subjective, is strongly ameliorated by the systematic application of tracheo-esophageal puncture [55,56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these the vocal rehabilitation by voice prosthesis, after total laryngectomy has represented the gold standard for the last two decades. [ 3 4 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%