2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-0751-9_95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Brief Review on Multi-objective Differential Evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to point out that, before implementing the NSGA-II algorithm, two evolutionary algorithms were tested. The evolutionary algorithms used were: The Multiobjective Differential Evolution (MODE) algorithm [18] and the Differential Evolution Multiobjective Optimization (DEMO) algorithm [19]. However, due to the nature of the calorimeter, the two algorithms could not be implemented, because the optimization problem had mixed variables, since one objective function had to choose the insulating material (something tangible), and the other objective function had to choose the physical dimensions of the calorimeter (numbers).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to point out that, before implementing the NSGA-II algorithm, two evolutionary algorithms were tested. The evolutionary algorithms used were: The Multiobjective Differential Evolution (MODE) algorithm [18] and the Differential Evolution Multiobjective Optimization (DEMO) algorithm [19]. However, due to the nature of the calorimeter, the two algorithms could not be implemented, because the optimization problem had mixed variables, since one objective function had to choose the insulating material (something tangible), and the other objective function had to choose the physical dimensions of the calorimeter (numbers).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, although DE is an evolutionary algorithm, it lacks a real natural paradigm and is not an exact replica of natural evolution, unlike other evolutionary algorithms. DE has demonstrated outstanding performance in a wide range of optimization problems from diverse scientific domains, including constrained and multi-objective optimization problems [23]. It belongs to the stochastic population-based evolutionary group and, like other evolutionary algorithms, uses a population of candidate solutions and stochastic mutation, crossover, and selection operators to move the population toward superior solutions in the design space.…”
Section: Function Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future directions- Besides GA, there are several other metaheuristics like PSO, DE, ACO, ABC, etc., for which the multi-objective variants have been developed and tested. For example: MOPSO [215], MODE [216], [217], MOACO [218] and MOABC [219], MOGWO [220], MOEA\D [221]. A study highlighting the features of different multiobjective algorithms is likely to be quite interesting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%