2011 6th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iciinfs.2011.6038092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A brief review on upper extremity robotic exoskeleton systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, leakage can occur and lines can burst, potentially causing serious injuries. The most promising and most commonly used RAS in wearable robotics are systems based on Bowden cables [10], [11], [17]- [25]. The integration into existing systems driven by electromagnetic motors is straightforward, the needed components are easily accessible, and the cables operate safely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, leakage can occur and lines can burst, potentially causing serious injuries. The most promising and most commonly used RAS in wearable robotics are systems based on Bowden cables [10], [11], [17]- [25]. The integration into existing systems driven by electromagnetic motors is straightforward, the needed components are easily accessible, and the cables operate safely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distal phalanx is located at the fingertip, connected to the proximal phalanx that is located at the base of the finger through middle phalanx. The proximal phalanx is also connected to the metacarpal bones in the palm of the hand [3]. The finger joints are metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints.…”
Section: A Hand Biomechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exoskeletons have been studied since the 1960s for industrial or medical applications. The first whole-body exoskeleton robot; Hardiman, was actuated and was supposed to be driven by a human operator from the inside of the robot [3]. Pons et al [4] classified exoskeleton robots into three groups; empowering exoskeleton which extends the strength of human beyond its natural ability while maintaining human control of the robot, orthotic exoskeleton whose mechanical structure maps onto the anatomy of the human limb with a purpose to restore lost or weak functions, and prosthetic robot which substitutes the lost limb after amputation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of such robots is the powered assistive lower exoskeletons that can be worn by human-operators as orthotic devices for human performance assistance or work augmentation. Up to now, this research field of exoskeletons ranging from upper [1] to lower [2] limb assistance/support has inspired scientists and researchers to deal with numerous related challenges due to its special properties compared to other classes of conventional robots. The review on the lower exoskeletons can be referred in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%