1995
DOI: 10.1006/jmra.1995.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bulk and Spatially Resolved NMR Relaxation Study of Sandstone Rock Plugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, can increase linearly from 10 Ϫ3 to 10 2 m s Ϫ1 for solids with increasing surface concentrations of Fe(III). This variation is as great as the variation typically observed for pore size distribution in natural geological materials (34). We have also found that NMR relaxation measurements are so sensitive to paramagnetic impurities that most natural samples will probably have values above 1 m s Ϫ1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, can increase linearly from 10 Ϫ3 to 10 2 m s Ϫ1 for solids with increasing surface concentrations of Fe(III). This variation is as great as the variation typically observed for pore size distribution in natural geological materials (34). We have also found that NMR relaxation measurements are so sensitive to paramagnetic impurities that most natural samples will probably have values above 1 m s Ϫ1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In general, 1 H NMR relaxometry is utilized in a broad scientific range as a way to determine the state of water e.g. in food samples (Regier et al, 2004), biopolymers (Hills, 1992), biofilms (Beuling et al, 1998) or granular sludge (Lens et al, 1999), as well as to determine pore size distributions in coals (Glaves et al, 1988), sandstone rock plugs (Roberts et al, 1995) and silica materials (Hinedi et al, 1997). 1 H NMR relaxometry is also used in many petrophysical applications (Kenyon, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the solid bulk concentration of the mineral is not the relevant parameter, since a paramagnetic atom buried even one atomic layer deep in the solid is expected not to contribute to the surface relaxivity (Kleinberg et al, 1994). Literature reveals surface relaxivity values for minerals ranging from~10 )3 lm s )1 for cleaned silica gel (Bryar et al, 2000), 0.8 lm s )1 for quartz (Kenyon and Kolleeny, 1995), 1.8-3.3 lm s )1 for clays (Matteson et al, 2000) and~3 lm s )1 for silica sand (Hinedi et al, 1997) to 9-46 lm s )1 for sandstone rocks (Roberts et al, 1995). For quartz and silica materials, very low concentrations in the ppm-range of Fe(III)-bearing solid phases, presented as surface coatings or as separate mineral grains, were able to increase the surface relaxivity as much as two orders of magnitude (Bryar et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stone with decreased local relative humidity. Indeed, this shortening can be used to characterise the pore structure when the relative humidity is known [7,8].…”
Section: Experiments 2-water Penetration Into Untreated Sandstonementioning
confidence: 99%