2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A C0-continuous RZT beam element for the damped response of laminated structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CPT underestimates the central deflection; accuracy of FSDT is strongly related to the use of ad hoc shear correction factors, such as Raman's shear correction factor [125]. TSDT and RZT give comparable numerical results, with RZT being less computationally expensive, especially when FEM formulation is taken into account [112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122].…”
Section: Bending Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CPT underestimates the central deflection; accuracy of FSDT is strongly related to the use of ad hoc shear correction factors, such as Raman's shear correction factor [125]. TSDT and RZT give comparable numerical results, with RZT being less computationally expensive, especially when FEM formulation is taken into account [112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122].…”
Section: Bending Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical tests on bending, free vibrations, and buckling of rectangular sandwich plates subjected to several combinations of loads and boundary conditions have shown the remarkable accuracy of the RZT, also for laminates and sandwich with weak external layers [86,[110][111][112]. From a numerical point of view, RZT allows for the formulation of C 0 continuity finite elements [112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking Di Sciuva's approach as a starting point, Tessler and co-workers formulated a refined zigzag theory, in the body of this paper named the standard Refined Zigzag Theory (RZT), for multilayered composite and sandwich beams [21], plates [22] and shells [23]. The interested reader can find assessment of the good performances of the standard RZT in [24][25][26][27]. Since the standard RZT requires only C 0 continuity in finite element formulation, which is very attractive from a computational point of view, many researchers have formulated and assessed various finite elements for beams/plates/shells structures [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader interested in a comparison of the performances and range of applicability of various zigzag functions is invited to read the paper of Gherlone [25]. From a computational point of view, the formulation of finite elements based on the RZT requires only C 0 continuity of shape functions [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Although C 0 -continous elements are the most-widely used in commercial finite element software due to their computational efficiency, it is well known that overstiff unrealistic numerical results are obtained when using the conventional low-order isoparametric C 0 finite elements (bi-linear shape functions for both deflection and bending rotation) in the analysis of thin and very thin plates; this phenomenon is known in the literature as the transverse shear-locking effect, according to Oñate [38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%