2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-021-01613-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A C0 Interior Penalty Finite Element Method for Flexoelectricity

Abstract: We propose a C 0 interior penalty method (C0-IPM) for the computational modelling of flexoelectricity, with application also to strain gradient elasticity, as a simplified case. Standard high-order C 0 finite element approximations, with nodal basis, are considered. The proposed C0-IPM formulation involves second derivatives in the interior of the elements, plus integrals on the mesh faces (sides in 2D), that impose C 1 continuity of the displacement in weak form. The formulation is stable for large enough int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as a FE method, numerical integration is straight-forward, prescribed values of the solution can be directly enforced setting nodal values, material interfaces do not need any special treatment as long as the mesh fits to the interface, and meshes can be refined where needed to capture features in the solution. In particular, in the presence of boundary layers in the electric field, an anisotropic FE mesh can be considered to refine along the boundary only in the orthogonal direction, as shown in the flexoelectric beam simulations in [21]. As expected for a C0-IPM formulation for a fourth-order PDE problem [4,5,12], the convergence rates are close to the convergence rates of standard FEM in second-order PDEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, as a FE method, numerical integration is straight-forward, prescribed values of the solution can be directly enforced setting nodal values, material interfaces do not need any special treatment as long as the mesh fits to the interface, and meshes can be refined where needed to capture features in the solution. In particular, in the presence of boundary layers in the electric field, an anisotropic FE mesh can be considered to refine along the boundary only in the orthogonal direction, as shown in the flexoelectric beam simulations in [21]. As expected for a C0-IPM formulation for a fourth-order PDE problem [4,5,12], the convergence rates are close to the convergence rates of standard FEM in second-order PDEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Flexoelectricity is a two-way electromechanical coupling, present in all dielectrics, that is relevant only at small scales [20], and can be modelled by a set of fourth-order Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) with proper boundary conditions. There are several approaches in the literature for the solution of fourth-order PDEs and, in particular, for the solution of flexoelectricity problems, such as mixed finite element methods [16,10], meshless methods [1], C 1 approximations on regular grids with embedded domains [13,18,8,22,17,9] or C 0 interior penalty finite element methods (C0-IPM) [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They suffer however from stability issues and from cumbersome modeldependent implementations, as well as from a higher computational cost due to the large number of additional unknowns. 𝐶 0 penalty methods also consider standard C0 finite element approximations and impose the required continuity across elements weakly (Ventura et al, 2021).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%