2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2022.113760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A C19Ti Cage vehicle for the drug delivery of purinethol Anticancer: Computational assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies done by jnl> researchers have done a great deal of job in lending clarity to the relationship between the magnitudes of a bond label tested against the abovementioned parameters and their implications with regards to the nature of bonding between the atoms under consideration which in this case are those formed between the adsorbent and the adsorbate [54–55] . It is pertinent to note that more often than not, the types of interaction encountered in a typical QTAIM analysis basically range from covalent bonding to partial covalent bonding and non‐covalent bonding with the criteria for desirability being the ability to have an efficient in vivo desorption time especially for a drug delivery system as this hence as equally confirmed by several independent studies, the lesser the covalent nature of the interaction the greater the preference for an efficient drug delivery [56–60] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies done by jnl> researchers have done a great deal of job in lending clarity to the relationship between the magnitudes of a bond label tested against the abovementioned parameters and their implications with regards to the nature of bonding between the atoms under consideration which in this case are those formed between the adsorbent and the adsorbate [54–55] . It is pertinent to note that more often than not, the types of interaction encountered in a typical QTAIM analysis basically range from covalent bonding to partial covalent bonding and non‐covalent bonding with the criteria for desirability being the ability to have an efficient in vivo desorption time especially for a drug delivery system as this hence as equally confirmed by several independent studies, the lesser the covalent nature of the interaction the greater the preference for an efficient drug delivery [56–60] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[54][55] It is pertinent to note that more often than not, the types of interaction encountered in a typical QTAIM analysis basically range from covalent bonding to partial covalent bonding and non-covalent bonding with the criteria for desirability being the ability to have an efficient in vivo desorption time especially for a drug delivery system as this hence as equally confirmed by several independent studies, the lesser the covalent nature of the interaction the greater the preference for an efficient drug delivery. [56][57][58][59][60] The r 2 1(r) and H(r) values show that firstly, the three BCP considered for Acetaminophen_COF tend towards partial covalent interaction, a trend which is equally obvious in Arsenic trioxide_COF, MERCAPTOPURINE_COF and Tioguanine_COF. Secondly, the first bond critical point for Clodronic acid_COF corresponding to the Cl 103 À H 52 is aberrant as it lacks both r 2 1(r) and H(r) (= 0 in both cases).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Quantum Theory Of Atom In Molecules (Qtaim)mentioning
confidence: 99%