2006
DOI: 10.1007/11682127_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cache Design for a Security Architecture for Microprocessors (SAM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next paragraphs are providing a brief description of SAM's main attributes. A more detailed architectural description can be found in [2] and the design of the caches in [3].…”
Section: Sam Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The next paragraphs are providing a brief description of SAM's main attributes. A more detailed architectural description can be found in [2] and the design of the caches in [3].…”
Section: Sam Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we first revisit the hashing scheme and data encryption proposed in [2,3], describing some weaknesses in security and performance. Then we propose some modifications on both the hashing and encryption schemes which improve the performance and strengthen the security.…”
Section: Hashing Scheme and Encryptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ideally, these schemes should provide a strong protection while keeping to a minimum the number of required modifications at the software layer (both operating system and user applications), and in the hardware layer as well. Some processor extensions, such as AEGIS [1] and SAM [2,3], have been so far proposed, providing a secure execution environment for programs. A program running inside a secure execution environment is safe against both software attacks (originating, for example, from a system administrator or even from a malicious kernel) and hardware attacks (for example, hardware supported sniffing on memory bus to bypass operating system protections).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%