A Cadaver-Based Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Posterior Approach to Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Analysis of the Fixation and Center of the Instantaneous Axis of Rotation

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the stabilizing effect of a posterior joint fixation technique using a novel cortical allograft implant in unilateral and bilateral fixation constructs. We hypothesize that fixation would reduce the joint’s range of motion during flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending loads. We also hypothesize that fixation would shift the center of the instantaneous axis of rotation during the predominant flexion-extension motions towards the implant’s location, and that this shift would be correlated with the reduction in flexion-extension range of motion. Materials and Methods Six cadaveric sacroiliac joint specimens were tested under intact, unilateral fixation, and bilateral fixation conditions. The total range of motion (ROM) of the sacroiliac joint in flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were evaluated by an optical tracking system, in a multidirectional flexibility pure moment model, between ± 7.5 Nm applied moment loads. The centers of the instantaneous axis of rotation (cIAR) of the sacroiliac joint were evaluated during flexion-extension loading. A correlation analysis was performed between the ROM reduction in flexion-extension upon implantation and shift of the cIAR to the graft implantation site. Results Unilateral and bilateral fixations generated sacroiliac joint ROM reductions in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation motions. Fixation shifted the cIAR to the graft implantation site. Reduction in the total range of motion had a moderate correlation with the shift of the cIAR. Conclusion Our novel posterior approach presents a multifaceted mechanism for stabilizing the joint: first, by the reduction of the total range of motion in all planes of motion; second, by shifting the centers of the instantaneous axis of rotation towards the implant’s location in the predominant plane of motion, ensuring little to no motion at the implantation site, thus promoting fusion in this region.

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain

“…Further distinguishing it is that the procedure is performed minimally invasively, which allows it to be performed on an outpatient basis and does not require weight-bearing restrictions. 215 …”

Biomechanical evaluation of multiple pelvic screws and multirod construct for the augmentation of lumbosacral junction in long spinal fusion surgery

“…The ROM of each lumbar segment and SIJ in this intact FE model was compared to the data in several in vitro studies under equivalent loading conditions ( Panjabi et al, 1994 ; Lindsey et al, 2014 ; Cook et al, 2015 ; Cross et al, 2018 ; Ntilikina et al, 2020 ; Sayed et al, 2021 ). For the validation of ROM of each lumbar segment, the S1 was constrained, and pure moments of 7.5 Nm in flexion (FL), extension (EX), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) were applied to the superior endplate (SEP) of L1.…”

Salvage of Failed Lateral Sacroiliac Joint Fusion with a Novel Posterior Sacroiliac Fusion Device: Diagnostic Approach, Surgical Technique, and Multicenter Case Series

“…In 2021, Sayed et al published data on the biomechanical effects of a novel posterior sacroiliac approach. 11 In a cadaveric study evaluating six SI joint specimens, the effects of a posterior SIJ fixation utilizing a novel cortical allograft were studied. They found that unilateral and bilateral fixations generated sacroiliac joint ROM reductions in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.…”

“…By doing so, the novel cortical allograft allows for minimal motion at the implantation site, which promotes fusion in the region. 11 …”