2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2010.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cahn–Hilliard model in a domain with non-permeable walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
110
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer the reader to [120] for the study of this problem (see also [96], [97] and [102] for similar dynamic boundary conditions in the case of semipermeable walls).…”
Section: Cahn-hilliard Equation 565mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We refer the reader to [120] for the study of this problem (see also [96], [97] and [102] for similar dynamic boundary conditions in the case of semipermeable walls).…”
Section: Cahn-hilliard Equation 565mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already mentioned, as the limit is not a classical solution to (3.5) in general, we first need to define a proper weak formulation of the problem. More precisely, this will be done by considering a variational inequality (see also [120] and [127] for a very close approach, but at an abstract level, i.e., based on duality arguments).…”
Section: Variational Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, in order to define dynamic boundary conditions, we introduce, in addition to the bulk free energy ψ Ω , a surface free energy ψ Γ and write alignedrightΨ =ΩψΩdx+ΓψΓ =Ω 1 2|u|2 + FMathClass-open(uMathClass-close) dx+Γ 1 2|Γu|2 + FΓMathClass-open(uMathClass-close) where ∇ Γ is the surface gradient and F Γ is a surface potential, with derivative f Γ (typically, FΓ(s) MathClass-rel= 1 2aΓs2 MathClass-bin+ bΓsMathClass-punc,aΓ MathClass-rel> 0; hence, f Γ ( s ) = a Γ s + b Γ , see ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, we will follow here another approach, proposed in , consisting instead in writing that we have the total (in the bulk and on the bounadry) mass conservation d dt ()MathClass-op∫ΩudxMathClass-bin+MathClass-op∫Γu MathClass-rel= 0 and that w MathClass-rel= δψΩ δu inΩ and w MathClass-rel= δψΓ δu onΓ As we will see in the succeeding text, one interest of this approach is that it allows to define and study dynamic boundary conditions in a systematic way (see also for phase‐field models). Here, this yields the boundary conditions ∂u ∂t MathClass-rel= Δw MathClass-bin−∂w ∂ν onΓ (actually, we can take, more generally, ∂u ∂t MathClass-rel= κΔw MathClass-bin−∂w ∂ν onΓ κ ≥ 0) and w MathClass-rel= MathClass-bin−ΔΓuMathClass-bin+ ∂u ∂ν MathClass-bin+ fΓ(u)onΓ …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a theoretical point of view, this system has already been studied (see for exemple [6] and the references therein). From a numerical point of view, we have several results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%