1999
DOI: 10.1006/inco.1998.2740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Calculus for Cryptographic Protocols: The Spi Calculus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
866
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 744 publications
(872 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
866
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[3]). For this reason, we keep this section relatively technical apart from stating an outline of the long and complex proof of the full abstraction result.…”
Section: Full Abstractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[3]). For this reason, we keep this section relatively technical apart from stating an outline of the long and complex proof of the full abstraction result.…”
Section: Full Abstractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applied π-calculus, the spi calculus [3], Burrows, Abadi and Needham's logic of authentication [9], which is nowadays known as BAN logic, and a number of other modelling and analysis techniques for security protocols rest on the Dolev-Yao assumption [11]. This means that the underlying crypto-system is considered unbreakable, so that the protocol logic on top of that is the only concern.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible to extend a concurrent calculus with cryptographic primitives, as in the spi calculus extension of the π-calculus [2]. Much fundamental progress is being made in this direction.…”
Section: Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such properties are generally modelled as a behavioural equivalence (bisimulation or trace equivalence) in a dedicated process calculus such as the Spi [AG99] or applied pi calculus [AF04]. A typical example is real-or-random secrecy: after interacting with a protocol, an adversary is unable to distinguish the real secret used in the protocol from a random value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%