1994
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3975(94)90226-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A calculus for the random generation of labelled combinatorial structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
228
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
228
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Analogous operators are admissible in the unlabelled case: disjoint unions ('+' or Union), Cartesian (or unlabelled) products ('×' or Prod), sequences (Seq), powersets (PSet), sets (Set) 2 , cycles (Cycle), substitutions ('•' or Subst) and sequences, powersets, sets and cycles with restricted cardinality. In Table 1 we summarize the relations between these constructions and the corresponding generating functions 3 (see also [10]). We briefly describe now the combinatorial operators mentioned above:…”
Section: Admissible Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogous operators are admissible in the unlabelled case: disjoint unions ('+' or Union), Cartesian (or unlabelled) products ('×' or Prod), sequences (Seq), powersets (PSet), sets (Set) 2 , cycles (Cycle), substitutions ('•' or Subst) and sequences, powersets, sets and cycles with restricted cardinality. In Table 1 we summarize the relations between these constructions and the corresponding generating functions 3 (see also [10]). We briefly describe now the combinatorial operators mentioned above:…”
Section: Admissible Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other algorithmic problems we do not consider here are: systematic generation of words (e.g., Dyck words), ranking, unranking, and random generation of words, see e.g., [Ru78], [BBG90] and [FZC94]. All of these are used in order to code combinatorial structures.…”
Section: To Algorithmicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, recursive methods [8] or Boltzmann samplers [7], which have been used for deterministic automata [6,2,9], rely on a good recursive description of the input, which is not known for acyclic automata. To our knowledge, the only combinatorial result on acyclic automata is due to Liskovets [11], who gave a close formula for the number of acyclic automata, but which cannot be directly translate into a good recursive description.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%