2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12547-3_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Calculus of Abstract Edge Pseudodifferential Operators of Type $\rho,\delta$

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a particular case of the next example, that of a desingularization groupoid, but we nevertheless treat it separately, for the benefit of the reader. See also [22,43,104]. We consider the following framework.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a particular case of the next example, that of a desingularization groupoid, but we nevertheless treat it separately, for the benefit of the reader. See also [22,43,104]. We consider the following framework.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize the construction of the desingularization, let us denote by φ the natural isomorphism of the following two groupoids: E(S, π, H) U1 U1 (reduction to U 1 ≃ S × (0, 1)) and G U1 U1 = (G 2 ) U1 U1 . Then (25) [ Similar structures arise in other situations; see, for instance, [14,28,19,35,34,43,44,56,53]. See also the discussion at the end of Example 2.4.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We also introduce an anisotropic version of the desingularized groupoid and determine its Lie algebroid as well. We conclude with an example related to the 'edge'-calculus (see [28] and the references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In [1], Abels developed a (different) variant of Boutet de Monvel's calculus with nonsmooth symbols in order to construct parametrices to elliptic operators with Hölder regularity. Also, Krainer [25] constructed a calculus with symbols of type ρ, δ taking values in operator ideals in Hilbert spaces. Theorem 1.3 and 1.4 extend [43,Theorem 1.2] in that (i) one can now treat manifolds of bounded geometry instead of bounded domains, (ii) the differentiability assumptions on the coefficients of A are reduced from C ∞ to C τ , τ > 0, for the top order terms and L ∞ for the lower order terms, while T can also be of the form (1.4), and (iii) one obtains the existence of a bounded H ∞ -calculus rather than the existence of a holomorphic semigroup.…”
Section: Relation To Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%