2004
DOI: 10.1002/asna.200310176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A calibration map for Wide Field Imager photometry

Abstract: Abstract. We present a prescription to correct large-scale intensity variations affecting imaging data taken with the Wide Field Imager (WFI) at the MPG/ESO 2.2 m telescope at the European Southern Observatory at La Silla in Chile. Such smoothly varying, large-scale gradients are primarily caused by non-uniform illumination due to stray light, which cannot be removed using standard flatfield procedures. By comparing our observations to the well-calibrated, homogeneous multicolour photometry from the Sloan Digi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The de-reddening procedure also corrects for residual variations in the photometry that result from the variation of the point spread function or illumination (e.g. Koch et al 2004) across the combined mosaics. We find a mean E(B − V) ∼ 0.5 mag towards NGC 4372 in a good agreement with the Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011) re-calibration of the Schlegel et al (1998) extinction map, with a significant variation between 0.3 and 0.8 mag across the field of the GC.…”
Section: Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The de-reddening procedure also corrects for residual variations in the photometry that result from the variation of the point spread function or illumination (e.g. Koch et al 2004) across the combined mosaics. We find a mean E(B − V) ∼ 0.5 mag towards NGC 4372 in a good agreement with the Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011) re-calibration of the Schlegel et al (1998) extinction map, with a significant variation between 0.3 and 0.8 mag across the field of the GC.…”
Section: Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However considering that the first one covers a small area of the sky (5.6 × 5.7 arcmin) and that the second one is based on WIFI@ESO2.2 data which is known to suffer of significant inhomogeneity (Koch et al 2004;Calamida et al 2008) we didn't consider useful to perform such comparisons. In conclusion, of the two studies we compared with, one (Stetson) supports our calibration while the other (LS00) presents trends both in position and in magnitude which are impossible to disentangle at the moment.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is well known to exist at the WFI to the level of a few hundredths of a magnitude throughout most of the field, reaching slightly above 0.1 mag near the edges of the field. Since no calibrations suitable for a quantification of this effect in our images were obtained, we applied instead the WFI illumination correction map in the R band derived by Koch et al (2003) and assumed it to be approximately applicable to the I and z WFI filters as well. Judging from the residual differences between the illumination correction maps computed by Koch et al in different filters, we expect the systematic error introduced in this way not to exceed 0.03 mag anywhere in the field.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%