2011
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/20/n01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A calibration method for proposed XRF measurements of arsenic and selenium in nail clippings

Abstract: A calibration method for proposed x-ray fluorescence (XRF) measurements of arsenic and selenium in nail clippings is demonstrated. Phantom nail clippings were produced from a whole nail phantom (0.7 mm thickness, 25 × 25 mm(2) area) and contained equal concentrations of arsenic and selenium ranging from 0 to 20 µg g(-1) in increments of 5 µg g(-1). The phantom nail clippings were then grouped in samples of five different masses: 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 mg for each concentration. Experimental x-ray spectra were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 for zinc. Using the empirical relationship [4] described earlier to fit this data resulted in best fit values of a = 0.32 AE 0.03 counts g/mg and b = 0.031 AE 0.007 mg À1 for manganese. Likewise, best fit values of a = 1.61 AE 0.25 counts g/mg and b = 0.022 AE 0.007 mg À1 resulted for zinc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3 for zinc. Using the empirical relationship [4] described earlier to fit this data resulted in best fit values of a = 0.32 AE 0.03 counts g/mg and b = 0.031 AE 0.007 mg À1 for manganese. Likewise, best fit values of a = 1.61 AE 0.25 counts g/mg and b = 0.022 AE 0.007 mg À1 resulted for zinc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each sample, spectra were obtained from five separate 180-s real-time irradiations. Following established protocol, [4] each of the five repeated trials were performed on the same sample. Analysis of spectra was performed as described previously in detail.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations