2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A calibration procedure for the assessment of work hardening part I: Effects of the microstructure and load type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work, presented in part [1] confirms these results: the mechanical tests carried out to obtain different hardening states show that the proposed methodology remains valid for any type of loading conditions, monotonic or cyclic, tension or compression.…”
Section: Influence Of the Loading Typesupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our work, presented in part [1] confirms these results: the mechanical tests carried out to obtain different hardening states show that the proposed methodology remains valid for any type of loading conditions, monotonic or cyclic, tension or compression.…”
Section: Influence Of the Loading Typesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The initial microstructure has been modified such that three microstructures of this alloy have been investigated. Details concerning the heat treatments that have been applied to obtain these microstructures and their characterization in the un-shot peened state are given in the part I of the present work [1]. The first microstructure is the reference microstructure (mean grain size around 4.2 µm and strengthening precipitates with a size of about 20 nm) obtained directly after forging and corresponding to the "as-received" material.…”
Section: Materials and Shot Peening Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations