2017
DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.6640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Call to Digital Health Practitioners: New Guidelines Can Help Improve the Quality of Digital Health Evidence

Abstract: BackgroundDespite the rapid proliferation of health interventions that employ digital tools, the evidence on the effectiveness of such approaches remains insufficient and of variable quality. To address gaps in the comprehensiveness and quality of reporting on the effectiveness of digital programs, the mHealth Technical Evidence Review Group (mTERG), convened by the World Health Organization, proposed the mHealth Evidence Reporting and Assessment (mERA) checklist to address existing gaps in the comprehensivene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“… 1 Numerous systematic reviews have been conducted with the same conclusion—the available evidence is of low-to-moderate quality and rigorous methodologies are needed to evaluate digital health strategies in low-resource settings. 2 Despite this evidence deficit, global stakeholders' interest in implementing and scaling digital health strategies in these settings remains strong. 3 , 4 In this commentary, we summarize the key milestones in the rise of digital health, illustrating efforts to bridge gaps in the evidence base, a shifting focus to scale-up and sustainability, growing attention to the precise costing of these strategies, and an emergent implementation science agenda to better characterize the necessary ecosystem of scale—the social, political, economic, legal, and ethical context that supports digital health implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 Numerous systematic reviews have been conducted with the same conclusion—the available evidence is of low-to-moderate quality and rigorous methodologies are needed to evaluate digital health strategies in low-resource settings. 2 Despite this evidence deficit, global stakeholders' interest in implementing and scaling digital health strategies in these settings remains strong. 3 , 4 In this commentary, we summarize the key milestones in the rise of digital health, illustrating efforts to bridge gaps in the evidence base, a shifting focus to scale-up and sustainability, growing attention to the precise costing of these strategies, and an emergent implementation science agenda to better characterize the necessary ecosystem of scale—the social, political, economic, legal, and ethical context that supports digital health implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em contrapartida ao PECS, as funcionalidades inclusivas e potencialmente significativas das TDIC para o processo de aprendizagem e do cuidado integral das crianças com TEA. Estas ferramentas digitais valorizam formas lúdicas, instigam a curiosidade e proporcionam novas oportunidades para ensinar, aprender, cuidar e interagir em uma sociedade predominantemente digital em seus processos de comunicação 12,[14][15][16] .…”
Section: Com Base Nos Dados Acima Os Aplicativos Comunclassified
“…During the development of personal health records, the human-centered design allows to the development team to focus on users' needs to increase the satisfaction with and acceptance of the system [12]. n this report, we intended to achieve comprehensiveness and quality on the effectiveness of digital programs proposed on the mHealth Evidence Reporting and Assessment (mERA) checklist, convened by the World Health Organization [30]. Our project aimed to introduce the BP as a personal health record, prepared by pregnant women in our community, assessed by a free and institutional app with a significant number of users.…”
Section: Comparison With Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%