2016
DOI: 10.3233/fi-2016-1394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Canonical Semi-Deterministic Transducer

Abstract: We prove the existence of a canonical form for semi-deterministic transducers with sets of pairwise incomparable output strings. Based on this, we develop an algorithm which learns semi-deterministic transducers given access to translation queries. We also prove that there is no learning algorithm for semideterministic transducers that uses only domain knowledge.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 11 Cases of free variation are thus not maps, as one UR can be paired with multiple SRs. The focus of the present study is on subclasses of maps, and so such cases will not be considered, but (finite) free variation can be studies in a similar way with the p-subsequential transducers of Mohri (1997) or the semi-deterministic transducers of Beros & de la Higuera (2014). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11 Cases of free variation are thus not maps, as one UR can be paired with multiple SRs. The focus of the present study is on subclasses of maps, and so such cases will not be considered, but (finite) free variation can be studies in a similar way with the p-subsequential transducers of Mohri (1997) or the semi-deterministic transducers of Beros & de la Higuera (2014). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we are also interested in extending these results to weighted deterministic automata for computing regular relations (Beros and de la Higuera, 2016) or elements of other monoids (Gerdjikov, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Mohri, 1997) establishes that as long as there is a bound on the amount of optionality, that many properties of subsequential functions are preserved. More recently, Beros and de la Higuera (2014) also show how to generalize subsequential functions in a way that permits a degree of optionality. While subclasses of classes have not been studied the fact that they preserve important aspects of the underlying finite-state transducers and that classes like ISL have automata-theoretic characterizations based on subsequential transducers (Chandlee, 2014;Chandlee et al, 2014a) strongly suggests that subclasses like ISL which permit a degree of optionality are only waiting to be discovered.…”
Section: Non-deterministic Regular Functions and Regular Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%