2015
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/36/9/1827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A careful look at ECG sampling frequency and R-peak interpolation on short-term measures of heart rate variability

Abstract: As the literature on heart rate variability (HRV) continues to burgeon, so too do the challenges faced with comparing results across studies conducted under different recording conditions and analysis options. Two important methodological considerations are (1) what sampling frequency (SF) to use when digitizing the electrocardiogram (ECG), and (2) whether to interpolate an ECG to enhance the accuracy of R-peak detection. Although specific recommendations have been offered on both points, the evidence used to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, this is a secondary analysis that used pulse oximetry data. Although pulse oximetry is acceptable for the analyses of HRV, future studies would do well to implement recordings of RVA using ECG at a higher sample-rate (Ellis et al , 2015). In a first step, the analyses focused on difference in structural thickness in selected ROIs, given that the majority of previous studies in healthy subjects addressed measures of structural thickness in association with HRV (Woodward et al , 2008; Winkelmann et al , 2016; Koenig et al 2018; Yoo et al , 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, this is a secondary analysis that used pulse oximetry data. Although pulse oximetry is acceptable for the analyses of HRV, future studies would do well to implement recordings of RVA using ECG at a higher sample-rate (Ellis et al , 2015). In a first step, the analyses focused on difference in structural thickness in selected ROIs, given that the majority of previous studies in healthy subjects addressed measures of structural thickness in association with HRV (Woodward et al , 2008; Winkelmann et al , 2016; Koenig et al 2018; Yoo et al , 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology", 1996) propose a sampling rate of at least 500 Hz. Furthermore, several authors have advocated a sampling rate of at least 1000 Hz in order to not bias the HRV analysis (Ellis, Zhu, Koenig, Thayer, & Wang, 2015;Hejjel & Roth, 2004;Singh, Manjit, & Vijay Kumar, 2014). Technically, video and plethysmographic system use sampling rates from 50 to 256 Hz (Chuang, et al, 2015;Moreno, et al, 2015;Parak, et al, 2015), i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…far below the suggested minimum of 500 Hz. Several studies also stress the importance of using appropriate algorithms to detect R-peak (Ellis, et al, 2015;Peng, et al, 2015) and appropriate correction methods thereafter (Rincon Soler, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of lower sampling frequency on the HRV indicators can be mitigated by signal interpolation [4]. The first step in the pipeline is therefore an oversampling to decrease the error in the estimation of the beat position.…”
Section: Oversamplingmentioning
confidence: 99%