2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cartesian-based embedded geometry technique with adaptive high-order finite differences for compressible flow around complex geometries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial conditions are applied according to the exact solutions, Eqs. (46) and (47) at time t = 0. First let us consider the solution of this problem with the Dirichlet boundary conditions along all boundaries.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial conditions are applied according to the exact solutions, Eqs. (46) and (47) at time t = 0. First let us consider the solution of this problem with the Dirichlet boundary conditions along all boundaries.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a significant number of publications related to the numerical solution of different PDE on irregular domains with uniform embedded meshes. For example, we can mention the following fictitious domain numerical methods that use uniform embedded meshes: the embedded finite difference method, the cut finite element method, the finite cell method, the Cartesian grid method, the immersed interface method, the virtual boundary method, the embedded boundary method, etc; e.g., see [44,47,6,40,41,11,16,52,36,31,29,30,28,27,15,7,5,4,35,42,10,8,9,37,26,3,46,33,45,17] and many others. The main objective of these techniques is to simplify the mesh generation for irregular domains as well as to mitigate the effect of 'bad' elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the difficulties in extension to irregular geometries of a ghost-cell immersed boundary method's lies in how to track the boundaries correctly. To the best of our knowledge, two ways to overcome this exist: the unstructured triangle surface mesh (Gilmanov et al, 2003;Mittal et al, 2008;Nagendra et al, 2014) and the combination with level-set signed distance functions (Liu and Hu, 2014;Uddin et al, 2014). The first method can be used to represent arbitrary geometries and has gained its popularity in biological fluid mechanics.…”
Section: Complex Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(73) converges to the same solution under refinement. The implementation of the method is a generalization of a recent implicit extension algorithm developed in [65], modified to ensure the idempotence of the extension operator; that is E 2 = E. First, a band of grid points that are within ∆ max = max(∆x, ∆y, ∆z) from the stoichiometric surface are identified as the boundary points ϕ bc (Dirichlet boundary condition data) of Eq. (73).…”
Section: The Extension Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%