33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 1995
DOI: 10.2514/6.1995-566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cartesian, cell-based approach for adaptively-refined solutions of the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more general meshes (see Def. 1), we give an extension of the previous scheme which is successfully used in practice [5,21] and has been proved to converge on quadrangular meshes [9], on rectangular meshes with local refinement [10], and on admissible meshes (in which case it is identical to the previous scheme). Section 4 is concerned with the proof of some discrete inequalities of Sobolev for functions defined on general meshes which yield the final L p error estimates for the schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more general meshes (see Def. 1), we give an extension of the previous scheme which is successfully used in practice [5,21] and has been proved to converge on quadrangular meshes [9], on rectangular meshes with local refinement [10], and on admissible meshes (in which case it is identical to the previous scheme). Section 4 is concerned with the proof of some discrete inequalities of Sobolev for functions defined on general meshes which yield the final L p error estimates for the schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, under the assumption above, such a constant exists in any of the reference cases: then the scheme defined by (3) to (8), and the weights of Figure 5 is coercive.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Coercivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the numerical fluxes are defined by (3) to (8). This operator is not consistent in general (in the sense of finite differences, see [17,22]).…”
Section: Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations