Institutions of higher learning employ compulsory attendance policies with the expectation that these mandates enhance students' academic performance and perceptions of course quality. However, numerous empirical investigations demonstrate equivocal and often contradictory findings regarding the relationship between attendance and various markers of student achievement. The present investigation extends this research by exploring the utility of student ratings of the need to attend class in predicting their perceptions of teaching excellence after controlling for class size, instructor availability, and small-group interactions. As hypothesized, ratings of the need to attend predicted excellence while accounting for a significant 5.3% of the variance. Discussion and conclusions highlight the utility of class attendance in understanding students' evaluations of teaching and course quality.Keywords class attendance . institutional policy . class size . teaching quality University faculty and administrators are often divided on compulsory class attendance policies. Indeed, survey data indicate that while numerous educators mandate attendance (Street, 1975), others leave attendance within the purview of individual students (Hyde & Flournoy, 1986). According to St. Clair (1999), university faculty and administrators fear that high rates of nonattendance lead to students' perceptions that a given course is a failure. Failed courses, in turn, adversely affect communitywide perceptions of the quality of the university and threaten enrollment, funding, and the future of the institution (St. Clair, 1999). Consequently, numerous researchers have attempted to ascertain the relationship between class attendance and academic performance.In an investigation by Hyde and Flournoy (1986), for instance, mandatory attendance was not correlated with academic performance. According to these authors,