2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case based reasoning model for multilingual language generation in dialogues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the decision is represented abstractly, the goal is to transform it into one or more sentences in text format that must be grammatically and semantically correct, as well as coherent with the current status of the dialogue (Lemon, 2011;López, Eisman, Castro, & Zurita, 2012). Several approaches can be found in the literature for this purpose.…”
Section: Natural Language Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the decision is represented abstractly, the goal is to transform it into one or more sentences in text format that must be grammatically and semantically correct, as well as coherent with the current status of the dialogue (Lemon, 2011;López, Eisman, Castro, & Zurita, 2012). Several approaches can be found in the literature for this purpose.…”
Section: Natural Language Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to (Cook et al, 2010) and (Kenny and Parsons, 2011) for a recent overview of VP systems. Although most systems are available for English, there are VPs for other languages (López Salazar et al, 2012). The PatientGenesys system is one of the few for the French-speaking community.…”
Section: Previous Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the research on CBR mechanism has become a hot topic in the field of artificial intelligence because of its advantages in short reasoning time and easy case learning ability. Some works applied CBR to HRI [1], [2] and multirobot coordinated navigation [3]. Our previous work [4] and [5], applied CBR to the real-time autonomous navigation and obstacle avoidance of a mobile robot.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%