2011
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case–cohort study of lung cancer in poultry and control workers: occupational findings

Abstract: These results may have important public health implications, since the general population is also exposed to these viruses. Elevated risks were observed for non-poultry-related occupational exposures such as working in a stockyard, working in a chemical plant, use of chemicals to kill moulds, and working in plants where plastic products were manufactured. These preliminary findings indicate that full scale epidemiological studies of adequate statistical power are needed to examine the role of occupational expo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Working in a stockyard handling cattle, pigs, sheep, or other animals appears to be associated with risk of tumors of the H& L systems. This is a consistent finding for other cancers in previous reports involving these same cohorts [8,[34][35][36]. Although this activity does not involve exposure to poultry, it does involve possible exposure to the oncogenic viruses of cattle, pigs, sheep and goats such as the bovine leukemia virus, Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus, and papilloma viruses of these animals.…”
Section: Exposures Outside the Poultry Industrysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Working in a stockyard handling cattle, pigs, sheep, or other animals appears to be associated with risk of tumors of the H& L systems. This is a consistent finding for other cancers in previous reports involving these same cohorts [8,[34][35][36]. Although this activity does not involve exposure to poultry, it does involve possible exposure to the oncogenic viruses of cattle, pigs, sheep and goats such as the bovine leukemia virus, Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus, and papilloma viruses of these animals.…”
Section: Exposures Outside the Poultry Industrysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In another study, elevated risk for poultry oncogenic viruses was recorded who (1) killed chickens (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.2 to 14.7; HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.3) and (2) had direct contact with chicken blood at work (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.8; HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9 to 2.0). Elevated risk of lung cancer due to poultry exposure was recorded for subjects who killed chickens at work (OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2-14.7) and ever had direct contact with chicken blood at work (OR 1.9, 95% CI: 1.0-3.8) (Felini et al, 2012). Furthermore, studies have found that those who worked as chicken slaughterer have around nine times the odds of both pancreatic/liver cancer compared with those with no such exposure (ACS, 2016).…”
Section: Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These significant risks persisted after controlling for tobacco smoking. The association with working in a stockyard has been also confirmed in a case–cohort study of lung cancer in poultry workers (Felini et al., 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In a most recent case–cohort study of lung cancer nested within the combined Baltimore, Missouri and Pension Fund poultry cohorts of over 30 000 poultry workers and controls (Felini et al., 2011), the main occupational risk factors identified after adjusting for tobacco smoking were for working in a stockyard (RR = 12.2); working in the deli department of supermarkets (RR = 4.1); killing chickens at work (RR = 2.5); working in a commercial poultry farm (RR = 2.2); working in the meat department of supermarkets (RR = 2.0); and working as a butcher (RR = 2.0). These findings like those from nested case–control studies in the meat industry also seem to implicate exposure to oncogenic viruses and fumes from the wrapping machine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%