2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3368-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case–control study of the risk factors for obstetric fistula in Tigray, Ethiopia

Abstract: Our data indicate that obstetric fistula results from the lack of access to effective obstetrical services when labor is prolonged. Rural poverty and lack of adequate transportation infrastructure are probably important co-factors in inhibiting access to needed care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exposure factor was the proportion of pregnant women who attended < 4 ANC visits. We enrolled 270 cases and 270 controls based on the following assumptions: two-sided 95% confidence level, power of 95%, ratio 1:1 to detect an odds ratio of at least 2 for the risk of OL among pregnant women who attended < 4 ANC visits as the main exposure variable [16][17][18]. We further assumed that controls were like any other pregnant woman in Uganda who attended at least 4 ANC visits (60%) according to the Uganda demographic and health survey [9].…”
Section: Sample Size and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exposure factor was the proportion of pregnant women who attended < 4 ANC visits. We enrolled 270 cases and 270 controls based on the following assumptions: two-sided 95% confidence level, power of 95%, ratio 1:1 to detect an odds ratio of at least 2 for the risk of OL among pregnant women who attended < 4 ANC visits as the main exposure variable [16][17][18]. We further assumed that controls were like any other pregnant woman in Uganda who attended at least 4 ANC visits (60%) according to the Uganda demographic and health survey [9].…”
Section: Sample Size and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size was determined using two population proportion formula using Epi Info version 7.2.2.6 software, 14 taking vaginal scar status of obstetric patients as a primary exposure variable and with the assumptions of a two‐sided significance level of α = 5%, power (1 − β ) of 80%, 95% confidence level, and a ratio of nonexposed to exposed ( R ) of 1:1. Accordingly, the sample size was calculated using the percent of exposed (with vaginal scarring) and having the outcome of 73.7%, 5 and the percent of nonexposed (without vaginal scarring) and having the outcome of 90.3% 5 . An adjustment was made for irretrievable patient medical records by taking 15%, then the final sample size required to get a statistically meaningful difference between the two groups was 224.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the sample size was calculated using the percent of exposed (with vaginal scarring) and having the outcome of 73.7%, 5 and the percent of nonexposed (without vaginal scarring) and having the outcome of 90.3%. 5 An adjustment was made for irretrievable patient medical records by taking 15%, then the final sample size required to get a statistically meaningful difference between the two groups was 224.…”
Section: Materials S and Me Thodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations