2008
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2007-1907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case for Clarity, Consistency, and Helpfulness: State-of-the-Art Clinical Practice Guidelines in Endocrinology Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System

Abstract: GRADE describes the quality of the evidence using four levels: very low, low, moderate, and high quality. Recommendations can be either strong ("we recommend") or weak ("we suggest"), and this strength reflects the confidence that guideline panel members have that patients who receive recommended care will be better off. The separation of the quality of the evidence from the strength of the recommendation recognizes the role that values and preferences, as well as clinical and social circumstances, play in for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
196
0
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
196
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…We assessed blinding at three different levels (participants, personnel/care providers, and assessors), and added three items that may have acted as potential sources of bias (patient baseline characteristics, surgical characteristics, and standardized anesthesia/oral analgesic protocol). The quality of evidence was judged using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework [60].…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assessed blinding at three different levels (participants, personnel/care providers, and assessors), and added three items that may have acted as potential sources of bias (patient baseline characteristics, surgical characteristics, and standardized anesthesia/oral analgesic protocol). The quality of evidence was judged using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework [60].…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this network meta-analysis, most of the evidence is derived from indirect comparisons. The quality of evidence was judged using GRADE [60].…”
Section: Quality Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Метаанализы рандомизированных контролируемых исследований II (2) Проспективные рандомизированные исследования с ограниченным количеством данных. Метаанализы исследований с небольшим количеством пациентов.…”
Section: уровеньunclassified
“…Результат влиял на уровень доказа-тельств, присваиваемый публикации, что в свою очередь влияло на силу вытекающих из нее реко-мендаций [1,2].…”
unclassified
“…For adults over 18 years of age an intake of at least 600 UI/day of vitamin D 2 or D 3 was recommended in order to maximise bone and muscle function. However, optimum levels of 25OH vitamin D were considered to be those above 30 ng/ml, for which an intake of at least 1,500-2,000 UI/day of vitamin D would be necessary 10 . From the age of 70, the Endocrine Society would recommend at least 800 UI/day, recognising that to reach its objective of 25OH vitamin D above 30 ng/ml, 1,500 to 2,000 UI/day of vitamin D 2 or D 3 could be required.…”
Section: Recommendations and Guide To Clinical Practice Of The North mentioning
confidence: 99%