A case for folletian interventions in public universities

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the ideological impasses between educationally minded faculty and neoliberal oriented university administrators. To bridge and benefit from these two perspectives, Follettian integration is introduced. Specifically, the ensemble learning theory (ELT) and entrepreneurship centers are illustrated as Follettian interventions and their reasons for success are discussed. Design/methodology/approach This paper is theoretical, but provides ethnographic anecdotes of the problems occurring during the rise of neoliberalism and academic capitalism in the public university. The successful use of the ELT and entrepreneurship centers is likewise explored anecdotally. Findings This paper illustrates the benefits of utilizing the ELT and entrepreneurship centers in two different university settings. Research limitations/implications While the sample sizes of this paper are small, the anecdotal examples provide the basis for reasoning by analogy. Practical implications This work illustrates two possible Follettian interventions that serve as a guide to assist university administrators and faculty to find common ground and better serve students and university communities. Originality/value The rise of academic capitalism and neoliberalism has devalued education and resulted in poorer educational outcomes and a modern generation with less intellectual capital. This is one of the first papers to utilize Mary Parker Follett’s theories of education and apply them to the impending identity crisis of the public university. The result is a win-win for both neoliberal administrators and faculty in the face of an impending identity crisis for the public university.

Failed entrepreneurship in a heterotopia: the story of Villa Ahumada

“…Here, the heterotopia defies both tactics and strategy to the detriment of the members of the heterotopiaand the people of VA. The heterotopia's ability to harness creativity and innovation is linked to the ability to raise social capital (Johanisson and Olaison, 2007;Pelly, 2016Pelly, , 2019a. In this case, there was not a lack of social capitalinstead, it appears that there is almost a negative or antisocial capital.…”

On the Plagues and Pleasures of Academic Publishing

“…In the worst case scenario the paper is rejected -leading to yet another faculty member feeling the pressure of the tenure clock or being ridiculed by colleagues. This is a gate keeping process where individuals from prestigious universities have an advantage, not necessarily because of the quality of the work, but because journals want to have top institutions listed in their tables of contents (Pelly, & Boje, 2019a, 2019b. All of these top journals publish in English, which further excludes individuals from other countries who want to become part of the conversation.…”