1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02482307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case of acute pulmonary embolism and acute myocardial infarction with suspected paradoxical embolism after laparoscopic surgery

Abstract: We describe the case of a 59-year-old Japanese man who had an acute pulmonary embolism in addition to acute myocardial infarction after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The posterior descending coronary artery was totally occluded. and direct percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty was performed. The pulmonary embolism was diagnosed by lung perfusion scanning and was treated with anticoagulant therapy. A patent foramen ovale and right-to-left atrial shunting of blood were detected by contrast transesophag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, reports of MI as a result of paradoxical embolism are sporadic in the literature. [12][13][14][15] Three criteria for the confident diagnosis of paradoxical embolism are frequently cited: 1) arterial embolism with no evidence of a source in the left heart or arterial circulation, 2) evidence of an abnormal communication between the right and left circulations, and 3) confirmation of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Paradoxical embolism can be considered proved only when the embolus is found located in the abnormal communication between venous and arterial circulation (the so-called impending paradoxical embolism).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, reports of MI as a result of paradoxical embolism are sporadic in the literature. [12][13][14][15] Three criteria for the confident diagnosis of paradoxical embolism are frequently cited: 1) arterial embolism with no evidence of a source in the left heart or arterial circulation, 2) evidence of an abnormal communication between the right and left circulations, and 3) confirmation of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Paradoxical embolism can be considered proved only when the embolus is found located in the abnormal communication between venous and arterial circulation (the so-called impending paradoxical embolism).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,9 These included at least 17 presumed cases of paradoxical coronary embolism, diagnosed post mortem, of which at least five occurred simultaneously with diagnosed pulmonary embolism. [10][11][12][13][14][15] It has been recently suggested that myocardial infarction resulting from paradoxical coronary embolism may be under-diagnosed, in patients with pulmonary embolism a patent foramen ovale. 5 Coronary embolisms have in autopsy series been reported to lodge distally and occur 3-4-times more often in the left than the right coronary artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Uchida and colleagues described a case of a 58-year-old man who developed PE and an acute MI simultaneously after laparoscopic surgery. 38 These 3 shortly characterized cases illustrate the difference of the time frame between PE and MI symptoms onset, focusing attention on the similarity in clinical signs and symptoms of both entities and emphasizing the difficulties in diagnosis making when they coincide.…”
Section: Paradoxical Embolism As a Probable Cause Of Acute Coronary Smentioning
confidence: 99%