2004
DOI: 10.3919/jjsa.65.3293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case of Acute Superior Mesenteric Artery Occlusion Treated by Intraarterial Infusion of Urokinase and Prostaglandin E1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although thrombolytic provides a good result in early period, it is not recommended because of the risk of bleeding after developing intestinal necrosis. 15,16 Catheter-directed thrombolysis may cause necrosis due to prolonged duration. Even partial successful revascularization may be sufficient in mesenteric interventions because collateral circulation between celiac truncus, inferior mesenteric artery, drummond artery, marginal artery, distal arcade collaterals provides adequate perfusions of distal vascular segments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although thrombolytic provides a good result in early period, it is not recommended because of the risk of bleeding after developing intestinal necrosis. 15,16 Catheter-directed thrombolysis may cause necrosis due to prolonged duration. Even partial successful revascularization may be sufficient in mesenteric interventions because collateral circulation between celiac truncus, inferior mesenteric artery, drummond artery, marginal artery, distal arcade collaterals provides adequate perfusions of distal vascular segments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A less well-established approach is the local infusion of thrombolytic therapy or a percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy with or without balloon dilation, both of which have proven to be successful. [8][9][10] Thrombolytic therapy has resulted in good outcomes during the early stages of SMA occlusion, although this therapy is not recommended after intestinal necrosis has developed, [11] causing an increased hemorrhage risk. [12] There are several techniques which require the infusion of a thrombolytic agent, with the most common being the McNamara protocol for peripheral arterial or graft occlusions, which involves a high-dose infusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgery, such as SMA embolectomy, SMA bypass, and resection of necrotic bowel, has been attempted, but the mortality rates have been reported ranging from 35 to 100% [ 7 , 8 ]. Thrombolytic therapy has resulted in good outcomes during the early stages of the disease, although this therapy is not recommended after intestinal necrosis has developed [ 4 ] and hemorrhage risk is increased [ 2 - 6 ]. There are several techniques for infusion of the thrombolytic agent; the more commonly used is the McNamara protocol for peripheral arterial or graft occlusions, which involves a high-dose infusion [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%