2022
DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case of cardiac strangulation following epicardial pacemaker implantation in an adult: a case report

Abstract: Background Cardiac strangulation (CS) is a rare, but potentially devastating complication caused by the leads of an epicardial pacemaker (EP). Most cases have been reported in pediatric patients, and there has been no report wherein the diagnosis was made in a living, adult patient, and treated successfully. Case Summary A 31-year-old woman with a history of atrial septal defect (ASD) patch closure and EP implantation for con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three yearly CXRs have been suggested as a reasonable interval with the advice that once the patient has reached their adult height these can be discontinued. The first case of an adult strangulation was recently reported in a 31-year-old woman perhaps highlighting the need for surveillance into adulthood [ 7 ]. It is important to remember that redundant epicardial leads which have been replaced with a transvenous system but are still in situ, have been reported to be substrates for strangulation [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three yearly CXRs have been suggested as a reasonable interval with the advice that once the patient has reached their adult height these can be discontinued. The first case of an adult strangulation was recently reported in a 31-year-old woman perhaps highlighting the need for surveillance into adulthood [ 7 ]. It is important to remember that redundant epicardial leads which have been replaced with a transvenous system but are still in situ, have been reported to be substrates for strangulation [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%