2019
DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.2459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case of effective oral rehabilitation after mandibular resection

Abstract: Radical mandible resection causes significant functional and cosmetic impairment. Nonvascularized bone reconstruction and oral rehabilitation using fixed prosthesis with dental implants enabled recovery of appearance and mastication function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…If the maxillofacial surgeon plans bone and tissue augmentation that assumes the proper placement of the implant structure, the patient may be able to reintegrate into society with fewer surgeries and treatment periods. The minimum bone width and height of the alveolar ridge for dental implantation must be >5mm and >10mm, respectively [6]. Reports on the use of distraction osteogenesis, autologous bone grafting [7], titanium mesh tray, and iliac particulate cancellous bone and marrow transplantation (Ti-MESH method) [8,9] for bone defects have been published in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the maxillofacial surgeon plans bone and tissue augmentation that assumes the proper placement of the implant structure, the patient may be able to reintegrate into society with fewer surgeries and treatment periods. The minimum bone width and height of the alveolar ridge for dental implantation must be >5mm and >10mm, respectively [6]. Reports on the use of distraction osteogenesis, autologous bone grafting [7], titanium mesh tray, and iliac particulate cancellous bone and marrow transplantation (Ti-MESH method) [8,9] for bone defects have been published in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nas reconstruções utilizando enxerto não vascularizado, ou livres, sua indicação está em defeitos inferiores a 5cm, principalmente laterais/corpo (Costa et al, 2010;Kataoka et al, 2019;Montoro et al, 2008), ressecções benignas e traumas que não envolva perda importante ou dano ao tecido mole remanescente (Miles et al, 2010;Okoturo, 2016). O tempo disponível para manipulação desse é maior, há uma menor morbidade, em alguns casos não se faz necessário o acesso extraoral na região receptora, e a sua estabilidade à isquemia e a reabsorção também são alguns dos atrativos para a sua utilização (Akbay & Aydogan, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A reconstrução dos defeitos em face é um desafio, (Ahmed & Aljeuary, 2017;Hanna et al, 2017;Miles et al, 2010;Okoturo, 2016) por se tratar de lesões que envolvem questões estéticas e funcionais (Ahmed & Aljeuary, 2017;Kumar et al, 2016;Okoturo, 2016). No tratamento da mandíbula, o objetivo das reconstruções é o reestabelecimento da sua continuidade e contorno estético, devolver altura e espessura suficiente para a reabilitação protética, restaurando função mastigatória, oclusão e abertura interincisal (Kataoka et al, 2019;Kumar et al, 2016;Miles et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minimum bone width and height of the alveolar ridge for dental implantation must be > 5 mm and > 10 mm, respectively 6) . Reports on the use of distraction osteogenesis, autologous bone grafting 7) , titanium mesh tray, and iliac particulate cancellous bone and marrow transplantation (Ti-MESH method) 8,9) for bone defects have been published in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%