2017
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2017-220580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case of hepatic, renal and duodenal penetration by a Celect inferior vena caval filter

Abstract: Inferior vena caval (IVC) filters are used as a mechanical option for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) when standard anticoagulation therapy is either contraindicated or VTE recurs despite adequate anticoagulation. Filters are not without risk, however. Reported complications include filter migration and fracture of filter components, leading to IVC rupture and penetration into pericaval tissues (notably kidney, heart, pericardium, thoracic cavity, liver, bowel and aorta). Here we describe an extr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first surgically placed filter developed by Mobin-Uddin (1967) was subsequently superseded by Greenfield's percutaneously inserted device (1973). 1 Today, IVC filters are used for the treatment of venous thromboembolism when standard anticoagulation therapy is either contraindicated or venous thromboembolism recurs despite adequate anticoagulation. The decision to place these filters is based largely on physician preference, as there are few prospective data or formal guidelines to support their use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first surgically placed filter developed by Mobin-Uddin (1967) was subsequently superseded by Greenfield's percutaneously inserted device (1973). 1 Today, IVC filters are used for the treatment of venous thromboembolism when standard anticoagulation therapy is either contraindicated or venous thromboembolism recurs despite adequate anticoagulation. The decision to place these filters is based largely on physician preference, as there are few prospective data or formal guidelines to support their use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%