A case of misalignment: the perspectives of local and national decision-makers on the implementation of psychological treatment by telephone in the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Service

Abstract

BackgroundPsychological treatment delivered by telephone is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for mild to moderate depression and anxiety, and forms a key part of the Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT) programme in the UK. Despite evidence of clinical effectiveness, patient engagement is often not maintained and psychological wellbeing practitioners (PWPs) report lacking confidence and training to deliver treatment by telephone. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of professional decision makers (both local and national) on the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of telephone treatment in IAPT.MethodsSixteen semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews and one focus group were carried out with decision makers (n = 21) who were involved locally and nationally in policy, practice and research. The interviews and focus group were coded thematically, and then mapped onto the four core constructs of Normalisation Process Theory (NPT).ResultsThe use of telephone for psychological treatment was universally recognised amongst participants as beneficial for improving patient choice and access to treatment. However, at service level, motives for the implementation of telephone treatments are often misaligned with national objectives. Pressure to meet performance targets has become a key driver for the use of telephone treatment, with promises of increased efficiency and cost savings. These service-focussed objectives challenge the integration of telephone treatments, and PWP acceptance of telephone treatments as non-inferior to face-to-face. Ambivalence among a workforce often lacking the confidence to deliver telephone treatments leads to reluctance among PWPs to ‘sell’ treatments to a patient population who are not generally expecting treatment in this form.ConclusionsPerceptions of a need to ‘sell’ telephone treatment in IAPT persist from top-level decision makers down to frontline practitioners, despite their conflicting motives for the use of telephone. The need for advocacy to highlight the clinical benefit of telephone treatment, along with adequate workforce support and guidance on best practice for implementation is critical to the ongoing success and sustainability of telephone treatment in primary care mental health programmes.

What influences practitioners’ readiness to deliver psychological interventions by telephone? A qualitative study of behaviour change using the Theoretical Domains Framework

“…If telephone is the only mode of delivery, a clear rationale for its use and a transparent approach are needed to set real expectations and improve engagement. These findings are in line with recently published research conducted with decision-makers in mental health, which highlights the importance of providing clinical motives for the use of remote delivery in IAPT services to promote practitioners' engagement [45].…”

Acceptability of the ‘Crisis Toolbox’: a skills-based intervention delivered in a Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team during COVID-19

“…This is not too surprising as CTB skills were derived from psychological approaches, including dialectical, cognitive, and behavioural therapies that have demonstrable efficacy for those at risk of self-harm and/or experiencing suicidal thoughts (Yardley et al, 2019 ; McCabe et al, 2018 ). However, the current findings also validate the acceptability and value of skills-based interventions delivered via telephone for this client group (Bidargaddi et al, 2015 ; Mulligan et al, 2014 ; Rushton et al, 2019 ; Irvine et al, 2020 ). This is an important finding as telephone interventions can increase access to psychological interventions (Irvine et al, 2020 ), which remains a significant challenge for CRHTT service provision and a frequent cause of patient dissatisfaction (Lloyd-Evans, et al, 2019 ; Chilman et al, 2021 ).…”

Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a UK-based focus group study

“…Government and the public health authorities should look at ways of extending mental health outreach services, especially remotely. 24 Timely attention is needed for those who are predisposed to depression and anxiety, those who may be suicidal and those experiencing significant social, economic and personal loss.…”