2014
DOI: 10.4338/aci-2014-02-cr-0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case Report in Health Information Exchange for Inter-organizational Patient Transfers

Abstract: SummaryObjective: To provide a case report of barriers and promoters to implementing a health information exchange (HIE) tool that supports patient transfers between hospitals and skilled nursing facilities. Methods: A multi-disciplinary team conducted semi-structured telephone and in-person interviews in a purposive sample of HIE organizational informants and providers in New York City who implemented HIE to share patient transfer information. The researchers conducted grounded theory analysis to identify the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With efficient and effective legal support and also support from deputy treatment affair, it is possible to make the hospitals adopt transfer standards, such as scientific and regular feedback, and thus overcome the barriers of a lack of both coordination and feedback. One of the strategies for establishing the feedback system in CTGI can be setting up the audit system and designing standard patient transfer forms to evaluate the quantity and quality of the transfers and sending feedback to groups involved in patient transfer (Farley-Hills & O'keeffe, 2010;Richardson, Malhotra, & Kaushal, 2014). Meanwhile, it is possible to receive complaints of legal entities by adopting the appropriate methods in CTGI.…”
Section: Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With efficient and effective legal support and also support from deputy treatment affair, it is possible to make the hospitals adopt transfer standards, such as scientific and regular feedback, and thus overcome the barriers of a lack of both coordination and feedback. One of the strategies for establishing the feedback system in CTGI can be setting up the audit system and designing standard patient transfer forms to evaluate the quantity and quality of the transfers and sending feedback to groups involved in patient transfer (Farley-Hills & O'keeffe, 2010;Richardson, Malhotra, & Kaushal, 2014). Meanwhile, it is possible to receive complaints of legal entities by adopting the appropriate methods in CTGI.…”
Section: Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical staff acceptance is always a challenge to any new technology adoption. Several barriers from end users of HIE usages are: lack of access to incentives/capital by healthcare providers [12], start-up costs [6], time burdens/constraints [48], [49], resources to select and implement a system (38%) [7], multiple logins [12], [39], prolonged data retrieval time, frequent system timeouts [16], redundant data, inconsistencies and physiological incompatibilities [39], [50], misalignment with current clinical workflows [19], [32], [39], [51], vulnerable information accessibility and misuse [48], and trust in external HIE partners [52].…”
Section: Results: Hie Adoption Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic notification of HIE data availability [60] would be an excellent feature as well as improving system and data retrieval response time [16]. For the long-term HIEs success, researchers believed that understanding end users' HIE perspectives and requirement is crucial as well as to engage end users from the beginning [51], [55]. Early user engagement pays off as physicians who prefer viewing patient health information electronically are at least three times more likely to adopt and use HIE [6].…”
Section: Results: Hie Adoption Promotersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty-nine of the included articles described studies that used qualitative methods to investigate interventions in all categories. 30,31,33,55,57,65,66,69,78,103,107,108,110,115,118,119,121,124,129,130,[136][137][138]140,146,158,159,164,168,171,176,179,192,194,199,[212][213][214][215][216]224,225,233,237,241,245,247,248,257,268,…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%