2021
DOI: 10.5811/cpcem.2021.9.53690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case Report of Prolonged Anaphylaxis after COVID-19 Vaccine

Abstract: Introduction: As the medical community and world have combatted the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a significant advance was the development of a vaccine against the virus that has already claimed over 4.5 million lives worldwide. Vaccines manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna were the first two COVID-19 vaccines given emergency use authorization by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Preliminary data demonstrated not only the vaccines’ efficacy rates of greater than 95% after … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…80% of all patients had a history of allergic disease and 40% had a history of drug allergy, which was similar to the studies in the literature. Although extremely rare, cases of vaccine-induced anaphylaxis have been reported in the literature, confirming their safety without a higher mortality rate than previous vaccines 20,21 . Anaphylaxis with inactivated COVID-19 vaccine is extremely rare, case series involving 12 patients are available in the literature 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…80% of all patients had a history of allergic disease and 40% had a history of drug allergy, which was similar to the studies in the literature. Although extremely rare, cases of vaccine-induced anaphylaxis have been reported in the literature, confirming their safety without a higher mortality rate than previous vaccines 20,21 . Anaphylaxis with inactivated COVID-19 vaccine is extremely rare, case series involving 12 patients are available in the literature 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Only 41 studies met our inclusion criteria 22,61–100 ; these consisted of 18 case series/reports, 18 cohort studies without control groups, and 4 cohort studies with control groups, one of which was a double‐blinded randomized clinical trial. The last study, Kaplan et al, 79 contained both a cohort analysis and a case series.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%