1995
DOI: 10.1016/0933-3657(95)00005-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study in ontology library construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whatever specific notations are used, the combination of conceptual and formal specifications provides great advantages, which the great majority of current terminological systems do not enjoy, mainly due to the lack of formal specifications. A challenging research issue is the automatic reasoning with (part of) these specifications, for example, as attempted in ontology-based knowledge acquisition such as in GAMES [37] and PRO-TEGE [38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whatever specific notations are used, the combination of conceptual and formal specifications provides great advantages, which the great majority of current terminological systems do not enjoy, mainly due to the lack of formal specifications. A challenging research issue is the automatic reasoning with (part of) these specifications, for example, as attempted in ontology-based knowledge acquisition such as in GAMES [37] and PRO-TEGE [38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine how the QR models can be formalised as ontologies, an ontological perspective on QR is taken. Previous research distinguishes different types of ontologies based on the type of ontological commitments they make [29]. For example, the ontological commitments of a knowledge representation language consist of the domain independent concepts.…”
Section: Export Of Qr Models Into Owlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our group focused on medical records and ontologies, at least four other groups worked on developing re-usable problem solving methodologies -Mark Musen and his colleagues at Stanford with PROTÉGÉ and EON [78][79][80]124], Bob Wielinga and his colleagues in Amsterdam with the generic KADS methodology [114,133,134], Mario Stefanelli and colleagues in Pavia's work applying KADS and related ideas to medicine in GAMES [38,112,126], and John Fox's work on ProForma with its emphasis on safety critical systems [42,44]. The first three took the distinction between the 'ontology' and the 'problem solving' method as basic, but concentrated more heavily on making the problem solving methods re-usable.…”
Section: Decision Support and Drug Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%