2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00484-006-0036-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study in resort climatology of Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Abstract: Tourists often use weather data as a factor for determining vacation timing and location. Accuracy and perceptions of weather information may impact these decisions. This study: (a) examines air temperature and dew points from seven exclusive resorts in the Phoenix metropolitan area and compares them with official National Weather Service data for the same period, and (b) utilizes a comfort model called OUTCOMES-OUTdoor COMfort Expert System-in a seasonal appraisal of two resorts, one mesic and one xeric, comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with previous studies of tourism climate in specific regions, e.g., Spain (Gómez Martín 2004), Austria (Matzarakis et al 2004b), Phoenix, Arizona (Hartz et al 2006), Lisbon, Portugal (Alcoforado et al 2004), Slovenia (Cegnar and Matzarakis 2004), and Florence, Italy (Morabito et al 2004), the advantage of the method employed in this research is that the PET index is more understandable for tourists who can assess the outdoor thermal condition based on their experience in an indoor environment. Furthermore, the PET frequencies for 10-day intervals combined with the results of the analysis of thermal comfort range display the likelihood of certain perceptions in detail for the whole year.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Compared with previous studies of tourism climate in specific regions, e.g., Spain (Gómez Martín 2004), Austria (Matzarakis et al 2004b), Phoenix, Arizona (Hartz et al 2006), Lisbon, Portugal (Alcoforado et al 2004), Slovenia (Cegnar and Matzarakis 2004), and Florence, Italy (Morabito et al 2004), the advantage of the method employed in this research is that the PET index is more understandable for tourists who can assess the outdoor thermal condition based on their experience in an indoor environment. Furthermore, the PET frequencies for 10-day intervals combined with the results of the analysis of thermal comfort range display the likelihood of certain perceptions in detail for the whole year.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Inexpensive water available on an annual basis and warm winters make these practices feasible and profitable. In fact, tourism which relies on resorts with mesic landscaping and golf courses is the second most important industry in the Phoenix metro area (Hartz et al, 2006). Compared to multimodality, growth length does not display any trend along the urban-rural gradient.…”
Section: Patterns Of Desert Vegetation Phenologies and Phenological Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rain is an important inhibitor to outdoor activities and also influences people's decision to travel (Meyer and Dewar, 1999;Olsen 2002). Therefore, it is problematic if a destination is continuously reported as wet when in reality, conditions are more favourable than at the location of recording (Hartz et al 2006). Another important issue of forecasting is the inclusion of locations that are relevant to tourism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%