2016
DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1278a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case Study of Design and Usability Evaluation of the Collaborative Problem Solving Instructional Platform System

Abstract: This study used Focus Group to analyze user requirements for user interface so as to understand what capabilities of the Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) Instructional Platform were expected by users. After 12 focus group interviews, the following four functions had been identified as essential to the CPS Instructional Platform: CPS instructional models, instructional resources database, evaluation system, and instructional plan sharing. The user interface for the CPS Instructional Platform were designed ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of user interface design, it is crucial to consider the impact of human factors such as cognitive psychology and user requirements. Norman (1988) emphasized the importance of orienting the design of user interfaces towards user requirements and conducting physical operational tests to reduce negligence in interface design (Adeleke et al, 2019;Chao et al, 2016). Additionally, the acceptance of user interfaces by end-users is a critical aspect that is influenced by both technical problems and human factors (Akiki et al, 2014).…”
Section: Human Factors In User Interface Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of user interface design, it is crucial to consider the impact of human factors such as cognitive psychology and user requirements. Norman (1988) emphasized the importance of orienting the design of user interfaces towards user requirements and conducting physical operational tests to reduce negligence in interface design (Adeleke et al, 2019;Chao et al, 2016). Additionally, the acceptance of user interfaces by end-users is a critical aspect that is influenced by both technical problems and human factors (Akiki et al, 2014).…”
Section: Human Factors In User Interface Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jin and Ji (2010), Park and Han (2010), and Ryu et al (2013) proposed a quantitative approach to measure the assessment criteria of cell phones, suggesting the introduction of the usability risk level evaluation in the early stage of concept design because an early design will affect the phone's user interface. Other scholars such as Chao et al (2016), Chou (2016), and Shi et al (2016) also proposed the evaluation criteria or operating efficiency data of various user interfaces for the applications of different products.…”
Section: Usability Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are examples of studies on the website usability of a university (Akgül, 2020;Cengiz, 2016;Hasan, 2014;Ismail & Kuppusamy, 218;Mentes & Turan, 2012;Pant 2015;Van Den Haak, De Jong, & Jan Schellens, 2003), e-commerce (Gonçalves et al, 2018;Hasan, Morris, & Probets, 2012;Lee & Koubek, 2010;Li & Li, 2011), e-government (Chang & Almaghalsah, 2020;Huang & Benyoucef, 2014;Paul & Das, 2019) and many more. Alongside these, evaluation of the usability of educational environments such as e-learning platforms (Granić & Ćukušić, 2011;Harrati et al, 2016;Shi et al, 2013;Ventayen et al, 2018), learning management systems (Althobaiti & Mayhew, 2015;Kakasevski et al, 2008;Phongphaew & Jiamsanguanwong, 2017) and other tutoring systems (Chao et al, 2016;Lin et al, 2011;Pensabe-Rodriguez et al, 2020) is also within this field of study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%