2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07518-1_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case Study of Energy Aware Scheduling on SuperMUC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will eventually result into faster power decrease when a powercap period is approaching and lower jobs' turnaround time after a powercap period is over. The optimal DVFS choice for the best power/performance tradeoffs could be also determined through a particular profiling run as proposed in [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will eventually result into faster power decrease when a powercap period is approaching and lower jobs' turnaround time after a powercap period is over. The optimal DVFS choice for the best power/performance tradeoffs could be also determined through a particular profiling run as proposed in [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After discussing with people from the Leibniz Supercomputing Centre operating the SuperMUC HPC system on which S3 is available, we get quantitative indications stating that, the power consumption on S3 mode is about twice bigger than when regularly switched off, and the On‐Off and Off‐On sequences are close in terms of duration. Thus, based on an Orion calibration from our measurements (as presented in Table ), we assume that an envisioned node with S3 mode would present the energy calibration parameters shown in Table .…”
Section: Impact Of Future Energy‐aware Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANTAREX focuses on a holistic approach towards nextgeneration energy-efficient Exascale supercomputers. While traditional design of green supercomputers relies on the integration of best-in-class energy-efficient components [19], recent works [20,21] show that as an effect of this design practice supercomputers are nowadays heterogeneous systems. Indeed, supercomputers are not only composed of heterogeneous computing architectures (GPGPUs and CPUs), but different instances of the same nominal component execute the same application with 15% of variation in the energy consumption.…”
Section: Runtime Resource and Power Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%