2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study of surface ozone source apportionment during a high concentration episode, under frequent shifting wind conditions over the Yangtze River Delta, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
60
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CBM-Z scheme and the outdated land-use data from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) were prone to undervalue the surface O 3 concentrations in association with producing high NO titration and dry deposition, respectively (Balzarini et al, 2015;Park et al, 2014). Similar underestimations were previously simulated in eastern China (Gao et al, 2015;Liao et al, 2015;. The mean NMB and NME of O 3 in MOD1, calculated at −53.97 and 67.00 %, respectively (Table S1 in the Supplement), were comparable to previous China studies (Li et al, 2012;Tang et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2017), while the mean NMB and NME of O 3 in MOD2 were ameliorated to −45.83 and 63.61 %, respectively.…”
Section: Chemical Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The CBM-Z scheme and the outdated land-use data from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) were prone to undervalue the surface O 3 concentrations in association with producing high NO titration and dry deposition, respectively (Balzarini et al, 2015;Park et al, 2014). Similar underestimations were previously simulated in eastern China (Gao et al, 2015;Liao et al, 2015;. The mean NMB and NME of O 3 in MOD1, calculated at −53.97 and 67.00 %, respectively (Table S1 in the Supplement), were comparable to previous China studies (Li et al, 2012;Tang et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2017), while the mean NMB and NME of O 3 in MOD2 were ameliorated to −45.83 and 63.61 %, respectively.…”
Section: Chemical Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…A 2010 report from HTAP (HTAP, 2010) shows that the observed baseline O 3 concentrations (concentrations without the contribution from local anthropogenic emissions) have increased throughout the last several decades since overall global anthropogenic emissions of O 3 precursors have increased. However, a more recent study by Gaudel et al (2018) has established that the global surface O 3 trends exhibit high variability and depend on several factors such as season, region, elevation, and proximity to fresh ozone precursor emissions. However, since the network capable of monitoring ozone levels is sparse, it is difficult to quantify the O 3 changes on a global scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average global ozone (O 3 ) concentration has approximately doubled during the 20th century and is expected to increase further (Fowler et al, 2008;Hartmann et al, 2013;Logan et al, 2012;Oltmans et al, 2013;Vingarzan, 2004). Currently, the ambient O 3 concentration in the northern hemisphere is around 20-45 nmol mol −1 , and it occasionally reaches 120 nmol mol −1 or more (Fowler et al, 2008;Gao et al, 2016;Lai, Talbot, & Mao, 2012;Yuan et al, 2015). Numerous studies have revealed that elevated O 3 negatively impacts plant growth and development and decreases forest productivity and crop yields as well as plant biodiversity (Ainsworth, Yendrek, Sitch, Collins, & Emberson, 2012;Fares et al, 2013;Leisner & Ainsworth, 2012;Wilkinson, Mills, Illidge, & Davies, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%