2022
DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v32i1.6589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case Study on How the Team Leaders in the Chinese University Lead Their Teams: From the Perspective of LMX

Abstract: The purpose of the current study aims to explore the leadership of the team leaders in a Chinese university from the perspective of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX). To fill this gap in the literature, the current study used a qualitative case-study method examining the factors that affect LMX at a Chinese university and the dimensions of LMX at a Chinese university. What emerged from the data was that: (1) all three participants considered followers’ personalities an essential factor affecting the relationship be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study tool can be broken down into five key sections: Section 1 of the questionnaire covers the demographic information about the respondents, including their age, gender, job title, level of experience, etc. Section 2 elaborates on the personality traits of paternal leaders (Cui 2022;Gyamerah et al 2022 (Nal and Sevim 2021;Shafi et al 2021;Tyagi 2021), and Section 5 explains employee retention (Gyamerah et al 2022;Harvin 2022). The close-ended questionnaire was created with the research paradigm in mind to guarantee that the participants had unbiased responses.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study tool can be broken down into five key sections: Section 1 of the questionnaire covers the demographic information about the respondents, including their age, gender, job title, level of experience, etc. Section 2 elaborates on the personality traits of paternal leaders (Cui 2022;Gyamerah et al 2022 (Nal and Sevim 2021;Shafi et al 2021;Tyagi 2021), and Section 5 explains employee retention (Gyamerah et al 2022;Harvin 2022). The close-ended questionnaire was created with the research paradigm in mind to guarantee that the participants had unbiased responses.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%