2021
DOI: 10.1080/15470148.2021.1879701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study on revisiting meeting and event competency standards and student perspective

Abstract: Utilizing an experiential learning project, reflection surveys, and post-program questionnaires, this descriptive case study approach explores a real-world event management course as a professional skill builder for students. Course outcomes were compared to the Meeting and Business Events Competency Standards (MBECS) Curriculum Guide to determine if the experiential learning opportunity addressed the industry standards. Student reflections were coded for categorical and themed relationships and post-program q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subjective and objective scope adopted in these studies has no equivalents in the literature on the meetings industry. So far, the focus has been more on the diagnosis of the educational process itself, mainly of students (Sox, 2021;Marton et al, 2018). The obtained results diagnose the condition of entrepreneurs' competencies in the industry and indicate the desired direction of the evolution of competencies and the processes of their acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjective and objective scope adopted in these studies has no equivalents in the literature on the meetings industry. So far, the focus has been more on the diagnosis of the educational process itself, mainly of students (Sox, 2021;Marton et al, 2018). The obtained results diagnose the condition of entrepreneurs' competencies in the industry and indicate the desired direction of the evolution of competencies and the processes of their acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%