2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2013.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study on the dynamic process of water drop impacting on heated wood surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a metal droplet impacts the solid surface, several phenomena occur, such as spreading, contracting, and bouncing. Also, the splashing occurs in the case when the impact speed of falling droplet is high enough to enable the secondary droplet to get rid of the surface tension of the original droplet (Lan 2014; Rein 1993). In PM, the Cu balls are created when the droplet impacts the ceramic within the steel container.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a metal droplet impacts the solid surface, several phenomena occur, such as spreading, contracting, and bouncing. Also, the splashing occurs in the case when the impact speed of falling droplet is high enough to enable the secondary droplet to get rid of the surface tension of the original droplet (Lan 2014; Rein 1993). In PM, the Cu balls are created when the droplet impacts the ceramic within the steel container.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the WE exceeded 564, bubbles began to form (Fan et al, 2018). In addition, Lan and Wang (2014) used experimental and numerical simulation methods to study the impaction of a single water droplet on the heated wood…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Droplet impact models usually specify the contact line boundary condition by assigning a solid–liquid contact angle which determines the liquid–gas interface shape near the contact line. Many studies have used an equilibrium solid–liquid contact angle, which is called a static contact angle in this work, as the assigning angle. However, the apparent contact angle can differ greatly from the static contact angle during droplet impact due to the contact angle hysteresis. Fukai et al took the contact angle hysteresis effect into account by assigning a constant advancing contact angle and a constant receding contact angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%